The Lie of the “Smart” Lateral Move.
Executive Briefing — Anish Majumdar
Senior leaders don’t stagnate because they lack capability.
They stagnate because they confuse movement with power.
The “smart” lateral move feels mature.
It feels strategic.
It feels responsible.
The justifications go something like this:
“This will broaden your exposure.”
“You’ll gain cross-functional visibility.”
“This positions you for the next step.”
And on paper? To someone who doesn’t know any better?
It looks smart.
But at senior levels, lateral movement is not neutral.
It either increases your power.
Or it quietly compresses it.
Here’s What Actually Happens
You take the move.
You inherit more complexity.
More stakeholders.
More coordination.
More responsibility.
You become more essential.
But you do not set direction at a meaningfully higher level.
And that’s the trap.
Because essential is not the same thing as elevated.
Essential leaders get relied on.
Elevated leaders get deferred to.
Those are not the same category.
Movement vs Power
This is the distinction most senior leaders never consciously make.
Movement =
More meetings.
More execution.
More integration.
More “visibility.”
Power =
Clear decision rights.
Defined authority.
Rooms where your presence shifts outcomes.
The ability to say no without negative repercussions.
Movement keeps you busy and permanently in the chase.
Power makes others orient around you.
If your lateral move increases movement but does not increase mandate, you are not advancing.
You are compressing.
Why High Performers Say Yes
Because you’re wired to optimize.
Because you believe leverage compounds automatically.
Because you don’t want to appear political.
Because you assume excellence converts.
Because you trust the system.
But at Director+ levels, elevation is not about how much you do.
It’s about how you are read under pressure.
And lateral moves often reposition you as high-functioning infrastructure.
Not indispensable directional authority.
The Executive Underclass
This is the part nobody names.
There is a category of leader who is:
Extremely capable.
Highly respected.
Constantly relied upon.
And yet structurally boxed in.
Too valuable to lose.
Not perceived as the one to elevate.
That’s the executive underclass.
And lateral moves are one of the fastest ways into it.
The more of them you accept, the more deeply you entrench yourself in this category.
And the easier it becomes for leaders with true mandate to use you without ever truly advancing you.
The Real Test
At this level, ask one question:
Did this move increase my decision power?
Not my workload.
Not my visibility.
My decision power.
Are others orienting around me more?
Or am I absorbing more?
If the answer is absorption, you are optimizing sideways.
And sideways optimization is seductive.
Because it feels like progress.
Until two to three years have passed.
This Is Not About Avoiding All Lateral Moves
Some lateral moves are strategic.
But they must increase one or more of these in a meaningful way:
Decision rights.
Access to power.
Authority in high-stakes rooms.
Control over directional outcomes.
If they don’t, you’re accumulating motion.
Not power.
And motion without power is a green light to every weak or abusive leader above you.
It tells them:
When pressure rises, you’ll absorb it.
You won’t push back.
You won’t force clarity.
And you won’t walk.
That is not the signal you want to send at this level.
If You’re Feeling This
If you’ve recently taken a lateral move and something feels tighter instead of broader…
If you’re being called indispensable but not being elevated…
If you’re doing more but influencing less…
That’s not random.
That’s structural.
And structural problems do not fix themselves through hope, patience, or another online course.
Leadership Presence Audit
Director-level and above only.
If you’re serious about restoring real power in your role — not just optimizing sideways — apply for a Leadership Presence Audit.
This is not a strategy call.
It’s a 45-minute pressure test.
We look directly at:
Where your authority is holding.
Where it’s leaking.
Whether your current path expands mandate or compresses it.
And what must shift immediately if meaningful elevation- title, comp, impact- is the goal.

